Wholesale Yarn Prices

Clarification and confirmation on the Auditorio Che Guevara.

received the reply of a fellow occupant of the Che Guevara auditorium, which makes a clarification of the opinion piece published on Wednesday, January 6 in this blog.
I want to emphasize that I am not a student at UNAM, I defend the occupants of the premises Che Guevara, repudiating the threat of eviction, and I get news from different groups.

I am aware that the occupants do not sell any psychoactive substance, but all is Said to be consumed in specific natures events, as in the shows (which has already clarified that there are more gigs in the area). The thing is, strongly fight this rut \u200b\u200bstrategic a political bump that put the authorities, so that, as I said in my previous article, the students demanded "voluntarily" facilities. Gradually it works, that is why the situation of false sales of various substances, is worrying and needs resolution in some way.

The request-a requirement not to make profit with the audience, is a form of warning, that the place is not for such a thing, we know (most), which is not its purpose, it is to invest just in materials and maintenance. We know that the shows were to raise the money that would go for everything you need (strictly), but to keep safeguarded the integrity of those who occupy the auditorium, as well as fighting the same function is necessary to seek new options for raising money (while respecting, as we know that the occupants respect others, that is not stealing).

The proposed academic activities, is proposed for space by the occupants themselves, not waiting for someone to ask for, because it seems that the audience is not for that.

Try not to fall into their game tactics, the government is the enemy, he and the rectory of the UNAM.Hay to go forward, let not any plot and action to intervene, to do an analysis to see where it is beat viable, how to combat them.

Those who are not students of the highest house of studies in Mexico, we also know of the situation, we want to participate to avoid the threats and harassment and of course, our most sincere and heartfelt cry of solidarity with l @ s s comrades who remained in a space of struggle, culture and autonomy.

Do Charter Buses Have Power Outloets

Auditorio Che Guevara, or eviction or subordination.

eviction threats Auditorio Che Guevara, have been since last year, can be clearly read out the intentions of the collective this place, with pretext that it opens the space for anyone and the deterioration of the auditorium. The commentary is almost unforgivable former Rector of the UNAM, Sarhukán, which states that agree to the expulsion of the occupiers of the Auditorium "First, because it's dangerous," a comment which was included in La Jornada on June 10, 2009.

In the Discussion on the direction of the Auditorio Che Guevara, Luis Cutie, a student at the Career Language and Literature read the general agreements, relating to the audience mentioned, the Assembly of the College of Letters Hispanic. I agree with the resolution of the above when they say "... no to eviction if the responsible use of space. Based on the auditorium is open for academic work in the community, demand that the occupiers should be established for academic work done in the following guarantees that dignify: Keep the auditorium free of consumption and storage of drugs, alcohol and snuff, keep clean the space, do not use the space for profit, do not stay overnight on the premises and no making parties in the place. "because the authorities as an argument to the Che Guevara auditorium, is a birthplace of alcoholics and drug addicts, hence the propaganda tactic to ask the student population voluntarily "back" the space, work sooner or later.

also agree that "We think about the meaning of place in the student struggle and social Auditorium Che Guevara should not be surrendered to the authorities ...." "... We propose that academic work in space, legitimizing the place ...", in which I disagree is in that budget would have to ask the authorities for the maintenance of the enclosure, as this would "say so, moral-that the audience passed into the hands of university authorities, ie government authorities.

Eviction space at this point in the twenty-first century, shows no more than a desperate act part of the networks of power steering-government, to suppress a revolutionary effort, ie, are typical drowned kicks by the state and right steering. However, if the occupants of the place which give scope for arguments to get them out of it, is normal to have so much controversy about it. The cultural, political and social, must share the place with the academic work that the Assembly of the Association of Hispanic Letters mentioned, in this way, the arguments of any authority to move l @ s compañer @ s the audience, would be inconsistent, making the student community can gain a variety of activities on campus.

I think it should be noted, but point out again, "to ask any authority, budget for the housekeeping, would be nothing but economic subordination of an autonomous space and free, which is based-in addition to the horizontal, self-management, not only to maintain an honor student, but to show how it is possible to walk through these steps this becomes available resources and means to keep alive a space control and academic activity and combative.

is why, I must speak out against the eviction, I personally oppose the eviction, said the famous Auditorio Che Guevara, as this would represent a blow to university autonomy and clearly to the student struggle evolution has taken 10 years of occupation.