received the reply of a fellow occupant of the Che Guevara auditorium, which makes a clarification of the opinion piece published on Wednesday, January 6 in this blog.
I want to emphasize that I am not a student at UNAM, I defend the occupants of the premises Che Guevara, repudiating the threat of eviction, and I get news from different groups.
I am aware that the occupants do not sell any psychoactive substance, but all is Said to be consumed in specific natures events, as in the shows (which has already clarified that there are more gigs in the area). The thing is, strongly fight this rut \u200b\u200bstrategic a political bump that put the authorities, so that, as I said in my previous article, the students demanded "voluntarily" facilities. Gradually it works, that is why the situation of false sales of various substances, is worrying and needs resolution in some way.
The request-a requirement not to make profit with the audience, is a form of warning, that the place is not for such a thing, we know (most), which is not its purpose, it is to invest just in materials and maintenance. We know that the shows were to raise the money that would go for everything you need (strictly), but to keep safeguarded the integrity of those who occupy the auditorium, as well as fighting the same function is necessary to seek new options for raising money (while respecting, as we know that the occupants respect others, that is not stealing).
The proposed academic activities, is proposed for space by the occupants themselves, not waiting for someone to ask for, because it seems that the audience is not for that.
Try not to fall into their game tactics, the government is the enemy, he and the rectory of the UNAM.Hay to go forward, let not any plot and action to intervene, to do an analysis to see where it is beat viable, how to combat them.
Those who are not students of the highest house of studies in Mexico, we also know of the situation, we want to participate to avoid the threats and harassment and of course, our most sincere and heartfelt cry of solidarity with l @ s s comrades who remained in a space of struggle, culture and autonomy.
I want to emphasize that I am not a student at UNAM, I defend the occupants of the premises Che Guevara, repudiating the threat of eviction, and I get news from different groups.
I am aware that the occupants do not sell any psychoactive substance, but all is Said to be consumed in specific natures events, as in the shows (which has already clarified that there are more gigs in the area). The thing is, strongly fight this rut \u200b\u200bstrategic a political bump that put the authorities, so that, as I said in my previous article, the students demanded "voluntarily" facilities. Gradually it works, that is why the situation of false sales of various substances, is worrying and needs resolution in some way.
The request-a requirement not to make profit with the audience, is a form of warning, that the place is not for such a thing, we know (most), which is not its purpose, it is to invest just in materials and maintenance. We know that the shows were to raise the money that would go for everything you need (strictly), but to keep safeguarded the integrity of those who occupy the auditorium, as well as fighting the same function is necessary to seek new options for raising money (while respecting, as we know that the occupants respect others, that is not stealing).
The proposed academic activities, is proposed for space by the occupants themselves, not waiting for someone to ask for, because it seems that the audience is not for that.
Try not to fall into their game tactics, the government is the enemy, he and the rectory of the UNAM.Hay to go forward, let not any plot and action to intervene, to do an analysis to see where it is beat viable, how to combat them.
Those who are not students of the highest house of studies in Mexico, we also know of the situation, we want to participate to avoid the threats and harassment and of course, our most sincere and heartfelt cry of solidarity with l @ s s comrades who remained in a space of struggle, culture and autonomy.
0 comments:
Post a Comment