Auditorio Che Guevara, or eviction or subordination.
eviction threats Auditorio Che Guevara, have been since last year, can be clearly read out the intentions of the collective this place, with pretext that it opens the space for anyone and the deterioration of the auditorium. The commentary is almost unforgivable former Rector of the UNAM, Sarhukán, which states that agree to the expulsion of the occupiers of the Auditorium "First, because it's dangerous," a comment which was included in La Jornada on June 10, 2009.
In the Discussion on the direction of the Auditorio Che Guevara, Luis Cutie, a student at the Career Language and Literature read the general agreements, relating to the audience mentioned, the Assembly of the College of Letters Hispanic. I agree with the resolution of the above when they say "... no to eviction if the responsible use of space. Based on the auditorium is open for academic work in the community, demand that the occupiers should be established for academic work done in the following guarantees that dignify: Keep the auditorium free of consumption and storage of drugs, alcohol and snuff, keep clean the space, do not use the space for profit, do not stay overnight on the premises and no making parties in the place. "because the authorities as an argument to the Che Guevara auditorium, is a birthplace of alcoholics and drug addicts, hence the propaganda tactic to ask the student population voluntarily "back" the space, work sooner or later.
also agree that "We think about the meaning of place in the student struggle and social Auditorium Che Guevara should not be surrendered to the authorities ...." "... We propose that academic work in space, legitimizing the place ...", in which I disagree is in that budget would have to ask the authorities for the maintenance of the enclosure, as this would "say so, moral-that the audience passed into the hands of university authorities, ie government authorities.
Eviction space at this point in the twenty-first century, shows no more than a desperate act part of the networks of power steering-government, to suppress a revolutionary effort, ie, are typical drowned kicks by the state and right steering. However, if the occupants of the place which give scope for arguments to get them out of it, is normal to have so much controversy about it. The cultural, political and social, must share the place with the academic work that the Assembly of the Association of Hispanic Letters mentioned, in this way, the arguments of any authority to move l @ s compañer @ s the audience, would be inconsistent, making the student community can gain a variety of activities on campus.
I think it should be noted, but point out again, "to ask any authority, budget for the housekeeping, would be nothing but economic subordination of an autonomous space and free, which is based-in addition to the horizontal, self-management, not only to maintain an honor student, but to show how it is possible to walk through these steps this becomes available resources and means to keep alive a space control and academic activity and combative.
is why, I must speak out against the eviction, I personally oppose the eviction, said the famous Auditorio Che Guevara, as this would represent a blow to university autonomy and clearly to the student struggle evolution has taken 10 years of occupation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment